EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION: EFFECTS OF SUGGESTION AND BIAS IN IDENTIFICATION FROM PHOTOGRAPHS.BUCKHOUT R; FIGUEROA D; HOFF E et al.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 6; NO 1; PP. 71-74; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

CAN PEOPLE DETECT EYEWITNESS-IDENTIFICATION ACCURACY WITHIN AND ACROSS SITUATIONLINDSAY RCL; WELLS GL; RUMPEL CM et al.1981; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0021-9010; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 66; NO 1; PP. 79-89; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

COPING ON THE WITNESS STAND: LEARNED RESPONSES TO "LEARNED TREATISES"POYTHRESS NG JR.1980; PROF. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 11; NO 1; PP. 139-149; BIBL. 2 P.Article

ADVERSARY PRETRIAL PROCEDURES AND TESTIMONIAL EVIDENCE: EFFECTS OF LAWYER'S ROLE AND MACHIAVELLIANISMSHEPPARD BH; VIDMAR N.1980; J. PERS. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3514; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 39; NO 2; PP. 320-332; BIBL. 1 P.Article

NUCLEAR WAR IN HUMAN PERSPECTIVE: A SURVIVOR'S REPORTTHURLOW S.1982; AM. J. ORTHOPSYCHIATRY; ISSN 0002-9432; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 52; NO 4; PP. 638-645; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

ZUR GLAUBWUERDIGKEIT VON ZEUGENAUSSAGEN: EXPERIMENTELLE UEBERPRUEFUNG AUSGEWAEHLTER GLAUBWUERDIGKEITSKRITERIEN = CREDIBILITE DES TEMOIGNAGES: EXPERIMENTATION DES CRITERES SELECTIONNES DE CREDIBILITEKOHNKEN G; WEGENER H.1982; Z. EXP. ANGEW. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0044-2712; DEU; DA. 1982; VOL. 29; NO 1; PP. 92-111; ABS. ENG/FRE; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION: LINEUP INSTRUCTIONS AND THE ABSENCE OF THE OFFENDERMALPASS RS; DEVINE PG.1981; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0021-9010; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 66; NO 4; PP. 482-489; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

IMPACT ON SIMULATED JURORS OF TESTIMONY AS A FUNCTION OF NON-EVIDENTAIL CHARACTERISTICS OF WITNESS AND DEPENDANTCATANO VM.1980; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 46; NO 2; PP. 343-348; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

ROGER G. BARKER AND BEHAVIOR SETTINGS: A COMMENTARYSCHOGGEN P.1979; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 37; NO 12; PP. 2158-2160; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

HYPERMNESIA IN THE EYEWITNESS TO A CRIMEEUGENIO P; BUCKHOUT R; KOSTES S et al.1982; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; ISSN 0090-5054; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 19; NO 2; PP. 83-86; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

THE COMPETENCE AND RELIABILITY OF A WITNESS IN A CRIMINAL COURT: A CASE REPORTGUDJONSSON GH; GUNN J.1982; BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY; ISSN 0007-1250; GBR; DA. 1982-12; VOL. 141; PP. 624-627; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

EFFECTS OF THE TYPE OF INCIDENT AND THE NUMBER OF PERPETRATORS ON EYEWITNESS MEMORYCLIFFORD BR; HOLLIN CR.1981; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0021-9010; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 66; NO 3; PP. 364-370; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

THE USE OF HYPNOSIS IN THE DEFENSE OF CRIMINAL CASESWARNER KE.1979; INTERNATION. J. CLIN. EXPER. HYPNOS.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 27; NO 4; PP. 417-436; ABS. GER/FRE/SPA; BIBL. 2 P.Article

ACCURACY OF EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATIONS IN A FIELD SETTINGBRIGHAM JC; MAASS A; SNYDER LD et al.1982; J. PERS. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3514; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 42; NO 4; PP. 673-681; BIBL. 29 REF.Article

HOW DO TRIERS OF FACT INFER THE ACCURACY OF EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATIONS. USING MEMORY FOR PERIPHERAL DETAIL CAN BE MISLEADINGWELLS GL; LEIPPE MR.1981; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0021-9010; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 66; NO 6; PP. 682-687; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

MOTIVATIONAL BIASES IN THE ATTRIBUTION OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR AN ACCIDENT: A META-ANALYSIS OF THE DEFENSIVE-ATTRIBUTION HYPOTHESISBURGER JM.1981; PSYCHOL. BULL.; ISSN 0033-2909; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 90; NO 3; PP. 496-512; BIBL. 2 P.Article

THE TRACTABILITY OF EYEWITNESS CONFIDENCE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR TRIERS OF FACTWELLS GL; FERGUSON TJ; LINDSAY RCL et al.1981; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0021-9010; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 66; NO 6; PP. 688-696; BIBL. 28 REF.Article

NEARLY 2,000 WITNESSES CAN BE WRONGBUCKHOUT R.1980; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; ISSN 0090-5054; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 16; NO 4; PP. 307-310; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

A VISIT WITH CHINESE PSYCHOLOGISTS AT BEIJING UNIVERSITYMATSUYAMA Y.1978; PSYCHOLOGIA; JPN; DA. 1978; VOL. 21; NO 3; PP. 177-178Article

NATURE OF THE WITNESSED INCIDENT AND STATUS OF INTERVIEWER AS VARIABLES INFLUENCING EYEWITNESS RECALLHOLLIN CR.1981; BR. J. SOC. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0144-6665; GBR; DA. 1981; VOL. 20; NO 4; PP. 295-296; BIBL. 10 REF.Article

DEMAND AND THE IMPACT OF LEADING QUESTIONS ON EYEWITNESS TESTIMONYWEINBERG HI; WADSWORTH J; BARON RS et al.1983; MEMORY AND COGNITION; ISSN 0090-502X; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 11; NO 1; PP. 101-104; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

HOW PERMANENT ARE MEMORIES FOR REAL LIFE EVENTS.SHAUGHNESSY JJ; MAND JL.1982; AM. J. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0002-9556; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 95; NO 1; PP. 51-65; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

ZUR PRUEFUNG DER GLAUBWUERDIGKEIT BEI ERWACHSENEN = VERIFICATION DE LA CREDIBILITE CHEZ LES ADULTESSZEWCZYK H.1982; PSYCHIATR. NEUROL. MED. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0033-2739; DDR; DA. 1982; VOL. 34; NO 1; PP. 26-31; ABS. RUS/ENG; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

ZUR VERLAESSLICHKEIT GEBUTSANAMNESTISCHER DATEN = SUR LA VALEUR DES DONNEES ANAMNESTIQUES SUR LA NAISSANCEBERGER E.1980; KLIN. PAEDIATR.; DEU; DA. 1980; VOL. 192; NO 4; PP. 325-329; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

ON THE PSYCHOLOGY OF EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY.LIPTON JP.1977; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 62; NO 1; PP. 90-95; BIBL. 27 REF.Article